Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI

From: Nathan Paul Simons (npsimons@fsmlabs.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 20:08:55 EST


On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:55:17PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Hardly. In fact the idea of distributing a different compiler for kernels
> comes from debian and the kgcc naming convention from Conectiva.

        What different compiler? If you're talking about the kernel-package
package of Debian, that's only scripts to generate a Debian kernel package
from custom source.
        As an aside, with all the griping that people do about gcc, i'm still
impressed that it can be used to compile both apps and the kernel. Granted,
this is mainly because of hacks in the kernel to make gcc compile it
correctly, but it's still a decent C compiler. g++ on the other hand . . .

-- 
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST