Re: atm_devs protection.

From: Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@bitwizard.nl)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 07:26:43 EST

Next message: Mark Salisbury: "Re: test10-pre3"
Previous message: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
In reply to: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Next in thread: Werner Almesberger: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:
> Rogier Wolff wrote:
> As far as module_unload, isn't that protected by lock_kernel? What am
> I missing?

Would "binding a socket to a VCC" also be protected by lock_kernel?
If it isn't then, THAT's the problem.

Roger.

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
*       Common sense is the collection of                                *
******  prejudices acquired by age eighteen.   -- Albert Einstein ********
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark Salisbury: "Re: test10-pre3"
Previous message: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
In reply to: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Next in thread: Werner Almesberger: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:13 EST