Re: Patch, spin-locks for CMOS access under SMP

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 16:26:58 EST

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "[PATCH] fixes to Pentium IV detection in test10-pre3"
Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: use of add_interrupt_randomness in drivers missing in many drivers"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Patch, spin-locks for CMOS access under SMP"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Patch, spin-locks for CMOS access under SMP"
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Patch, spin-locks for CMOS access under SMP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

>
> This puts CMOS Chip access under a spin-lock and exports the
> rtc_lock symbol. It is for 2.2.17, should patch to 2.2.18.

Nice. You've managed to find places we haven't yet fixed it in 2.4 either
:)

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "[PATCH] fixes to Pentium IV detection in test10-pre3"
Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: use of add_interrupt_randomness in drivers missing in many drivers"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Patch, spin-locks for CMOS access under SMP"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Patch, spin-locks for CMOS access under SMP"
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Patch, spin-locks for CMOS access under SMP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:14 EST