Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses

From: Felix von Leitner (leitner@convergence.de)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 11:18:34 EST


Thus spake David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com):
> I'll say it again, if you have to make changes to apps/servers the
> feature does not make any sense. It must operate transparently or
> not at all.

There once was a socket file system which solved exactly this problem in
a nice and obvious way. If you wanted to allow user joe to bind to port
80, you just do "chown joe /socks/80".

Whatever happened to that neat idea?
If it was under /proc, I would be happy.

Felix
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST