Re: process header declaration?

• Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
• Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: Linux 2.2.18pre17"
• In reply to: Andrew C. Dingman: "process header declaration?"
• Next in thread: John Kacur: "Re: process header declaration?"
• Reply: John Kacur: "Re: process header declaration?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

** Reply to message from "Andrew C. Dingman"
<dingman@dingman.student.earlham.edu> on Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:30:51 -0500 (EST)

> I'm working on a project for my senior seminar for which I (and my
> profs) think I need to modify the process descriptor
> struct. Unfortunately, I don't seem to be good enough with 'grep' to
> figure out where the type is declared.

Spend the money to get a real editor, like Visual SlickEdit for Linux. It
makes analyzing the Linux kernel ten times easier. In this case, a single
keystroke would have told you where that structure (or any field in any
structure) is defined.

-- 
Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com
When replying to a mailing-list message, please direct the reply to the mailing list only.  Don't send another copy to me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
• Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: Linux 2.2.18pre17"
• In reply to: Andrew C. Dingman: "process header declaration?"
• Next in thread: John Kacur: "Re: process header declaration?"
• Reply: John Kacur: "Re: process header declaration?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST