Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 13:09:02 EST

Next message: Wayne.Brown@altec.com: "Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux"
Previous message: Timur Tabi: "Re: process header declaration?"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:45:02AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> To this I agree, but I cannot change the fact that this assumption
> does exist in applications, so this is why I reverted the change.

Would you accept a patch for an setsockopt to enable it again ?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Wayne.Brown@altec.com: "Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux"
Previous message: Timur Tabi: "Re: process header declaration?"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST