On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:08:12PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> 8< snip >8
>
> > For the subset 1 above, I am preparing to begin to run regularly
> > (weekly very least, daily possibly) scanner which tries interactive
> > testing of recipients address at all of user's domain's MX servers,
> > and if any of the MX systems for user's domain gives a bad
> > response for subscriber's address, that user gets the log report
> > and some pointers on what to do.
>
> It also sends a report for perfectly working systems... Just got two
> of theses... Is this a normal feature of your checking script ?
There are now two things running.
- Post individual messages to *all* subscribers
(to find misbehaving autoresponder(s))
- Do that with MX verifier -- turning on a flag
forcing also successes to be reported to the people.
The uninteded double-reports are due to me having the script
running in two instances for a moment. I thought I SIGTERMed
the first one immediately when it showed a nuisance detail in
online monitoring feature, but alas, things were not so.
In the future the MX verifier will report only cases with
problems to the users who are likely to encounter them.
> Phil.
/Matti Aarnio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:16 EST