Re: OOM Test Case - Failed!

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Oct 21 2000 - 14:05:28 EST


On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Stephen Tweedie wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:02:52AM -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote:
>
> > I am very unimpressed with the current OOM killer. After 10 days of online
> > time, I decided to try compiling gcc again, the very culprit that killed my
> > last system using 2.4.0-test8 Friday night (to which I was unable to reset
> > the system until Monday morning).
> >
> > root 1099 63.6 61.5 71424 18740 pts/0 R 09:39 1:22 ./genattrtab
>
> The oom killer avoided killing your busy, large, root-owned
> process. Don't run gcc compiles as root. Protecting root
> processes is an explicit design goal here.

Also:

1) his system pretty much continued to run
2) since only httpd children got killed, no work
   was lost

(only the fact that he ran genattrtab as root screwed
up things a bit and kept the system from killing the
task -- but probably only just)

regards,

Rik

--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
       -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST