Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

From: Jason Slagle (raistlin@tacorp.net)
Date: Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:48:56 EST


It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.

I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
well over a year and only just now have problems :)

Jason

---
Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio
- raistlin@tacorp.net - jslagle@toledolink.com - WHOIS JS10172
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12 GE d-- s:+ a-- C++ UL+++ P--- L+++ E- W- N+ o-- K- w---
O M- V PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+ DI+ D G e+ h! r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Roeland Th. Jansen wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 07:37:36PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote: > > I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all > > SCSI. > > > > These bad? They worked well under 2.2 but who knows under 2.4 > > > 1) clock the system to specs -- overclocking could kill the stuff > 2) there are batches of BP6's (rev 1.1) that may fail due to an > incorrect capacitor behind some regulator, causing crashes > > > -- > Grobbebol's Home | Don't give in to spammers. -o) > http://www.xs4all.nl/~bengel | Use your real e-mail address /\ > Linux 2.2.16 SMP 2x466MHz / 256 MB | on Usenet. _\_v >

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST