Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Sun Oct 29 2000 - 02:15:53 EST

Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: tcp.c::wait_for_tcp_memory() buggy ?"
Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "vger.timpanogas.org is upgraded and back up"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 11:46:37PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Think about swap-over-network.

swap-over-network is unlikely to ever work properly without a preallocated
skb pool, no matter if you use sk->allocation or not.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: tcp.c::wait_for_tcp_memory() buggy ?"
Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "vger.timpanogas.org is upgraded and back up"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:24 EST