Re: [PATCH] kiobuf/rawio fixes for 2.4.0-test10-pre6

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@caldera.de)
Date: Mon Oct 30 2000 - 14:44:03 EST


On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:56:07PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> My question from above is: how can the via audio mmap in test10-preXX
> be improved by using kiobufs? I am not a kiobuf expert, but AFAICS a
> non-kiobuf implementation is better for audio drivers. (and the via
> audio mmap implementation is what some other audio drivers are about to
> start using...)

I think the biggest advantage is that you actually get the list of pages
when you perform the mmap instead of doing virt_to_page on every ->nopage.
That should speed up the operations on the mmap'ed are a bit.

The other strong argument for the kiobuf solution is code-sharing. Instead
of having every (sound) driver playing with the vm, there is one central
place when you use kvmaps.

        Christoph

-- 
Always remember that you are unique.  Just like everyone else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST