Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@caldera.de)
Date: Thu Nov 02 2000 - 15:27:30 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: non-gcc linux?"
Previous message: Håvard Garnes: "Oops when loading 3c509-module in test10"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)"
Next in thread: Kai Henningsen: "Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <20001102212124.A15054@gruyere.muc.suse.de> you wrote:
> You also forgot named structure initializers, but C99 supports them
> again with a different syntax than gcc [I guess it would have been too easy
> to just use the gcc syntax]

The named initializers syntax in C99 is from plan9, besides beeing probably
older, it is from the C creators and more logic ;)

I think that are enough reasons for the ANSI people to not choose the GCC
syntax.

Christoph

-- 
Always remember that you are unique.  Just like everyone else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: non-gcc linux?"
Previous message: Håvard Garnes: "Oops when loading 3c509-module in test10"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)"
Next in thread: Kai Henningsen: "Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST