>
Thank you for the information.
I will give it some thought and see if I can come up
with something that will fit both bills...
The problem is that the disks that I have are
very wide-spread, I would imagine. Compaq is shipping
them in their newer machines, so some compromise has
to be arrived at.
I will look into the matter further.
Thanks again.
cheers,
eamb
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:24:47PM -0600, Elizabeth Morris-Baker wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I know that is in the spec, but truly,
> > some scsi devices do act this way....
> > Maybe they need to read the spec :>
> >
> > I have included the START_STOP for Matthew, but
> > I never see it execute with the ATLAS disks...
> > A diff follows for those that want to try it..
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Elizabeth
>
> Well, if I'm not all mistaken, this is the code that got removed earlier
> on from the kernel because it caused some SCSI-adapters to hang on
> scsi-scan?! If so, what's better: to follow the specs and penalise the
> bad guys, or ignore the specs and penalise the good guys...
>
>
> /David Weinehall
> _ _
> // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
> // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky //
> \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST