Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 05:54:39 EST


> Even 2.2.x can be fixed to do the wake-one for accept(), if required.

Do we really want to retrofit wake_one to 2.2. I know Im not terribly keen to
try and backport all the mechanism. I think for 2.2 using the semaphore is a
good approach. Its a hack to fix an old OS kernel. For 2.4 its not needed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST