Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)

From: Andre Hedrick (andre@linux-ide.org)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 04:40:09 EST


On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Neil Brown wrote:
> > It looks like an interupt is happening while another interrupt is
> > happening, which should be impossible... but it isn't.
>
> If multiple interrupts are hitting a single code path (like IDE irqs 14
> -and- 15), you definitely have to think about that. The reentrancy
> guarantee only exists when a single IRQ is assigned to a single
> handler...
Jeff,

This is likely the classic case where the driver hangs on to the global
lock way to lock because it is grabbed to early wrt what I am changing the
behavior to...

Cheers,

Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST