Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 07:03:52 EST


> I don't think that is reasonable.

I think its totally reasonable.

> The first thing most drivers do is reset the hardware. That inevitably

Because there is no persistent storage to remember the fact the hardware is
running.

> You are depending on the hardware to keep its state -between- driver
> unload and driver reload. That seems inherently unstable to me. It
> amazes me that such is supported.

Well if you want to rewrite the entire module handling and locking so that
mixer levels determine the load/unload behaviour according to AC97 register
combinations and then train users to mute all their inputs before using
rmmod go ahead 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST