Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

From: Andrew Pimlott (andrew@pimlott.ne.mediaone.net)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 08:44:43 EST


On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 08:00:05AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I'm more interested in the case where the module is loaded for the second
> time:

Is there really a reason to unload a module in normal usage? Beyond
miniscule memory savings and hack value? You can solve the whole
problem with a loud "don't do that".

Andrew
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:19 EST