Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land

• Next message: George Talbot: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land"
• Previous message: George Talbot: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land programmer..."
• In reply to: George Talbot: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land"
• Next in thread: Tim Hockin: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, George Talbot wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 14:44:17 -0500
> > From: george@moberg.com
> >
> > My problem is that pthread_create (glibc 2.1.3, kernel 2.2.17 i686) is
> > failing because, deep inside glibc somewhere, nanosleep() is returning
> > EINTR.
> >

I've lost previous messages but have You tried :

man siginterrupt

- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: George Talbot: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land"
• Previous message: George Talbot: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land programmer..."
• In reply to: George Talbot: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land"
• Next in thread: Tim Hockin: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:19 EST