Re: non-gcc linux?

From: Adam Sampson (ats1@ukc.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 18:14:56 EST


On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 06:01:29PM -0700, Tim Riker wrote:
> In short the impact of adding code to gcc that is not copyright FSF is
> minimal. Only the FSF copyrighted code would be defensible by the FSF. Any
> other code GPL violations would be the responsibility of the copyright
> owners to defend.

Just as a minor point: pro64 _does_ use GCC code. It's effectively the GCC
frontend stuck together with the SGI backend, with a translation layer in
the middle to translate between the intermediate code formats that the two
compilers use. There are some fairly entertaining "this is a gruesome hack"
comments in the source code.

-- 

Adam Sampson azz@gnu.org

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST