Re: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4?

From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Sun Nov 12 2000 - 09:26:57 EST


Hello!

> NetBSD ignores 0 timestamps. Although that's a hack it is IMHO a reasonable one and
> Linux should probably do it too. Even when the 0 is generated legitimately by wrapping
> counters it is probably not a big problem to lose timestamps for such few packets.

Sorry, ignoring some values of timestamp is simply impossible.
It is PAWS. One packet is more than enough to kill you. 8)

Zero _echo_ is ignored in RTTM, which is required by the way.

Alexey

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST