Re: rdtsc to mili secs?

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Sat Nov 18 2000 - 18:48:06 EST


Followup to: <20001118211349.B382@bug.ucw.cz>
By author: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel

> > Actually, on machines where RDTSC works correctly, you'd like to use
> > that to detect a lost timer interrupt.
> >
> > It's tough, it really is :(
>
> Well, my patch did not do that but you probably want lost timer
> interrupt detection so that you avoid false alarms.
>
> But that means you can no longer detect speed change after 10msec:
>
> going from 150MHz to 300MHz is very similar to one lost timer
> interrupt.
>

That's the point.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:16 EST