Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" from drivers/ide (test11)

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue Nov 21 2000 - 19:09:11 EST

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: e2fs performance as function of block size"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux 2.4.0test11-ac1"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" from drivers/ide (test11)"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" from drivers/ide (test11)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:25:01 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > -static int dataPort = 0; /* port for register data */
> > +static int dataPort; /* port for register data */
>
> That is not too much confidence on the ANSI-ness of the compiler ???

There is nothing wrong with that change. Standard kernel style cleanup,
which saves a few bytes in the output kernel image.

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik             |
Building 1024           | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft            |          -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: e2fs performance as function of block size"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux 2.4.0test11-ac1"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" from drivers/ide (test11)"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" from drivers/ide (test11)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:22 EST