Re: include conventions /usr/include/linux/sys ?

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 20:14:17 EST


On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:35:43PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHOEKLCJAA.law@sgi.com>
> By author: "LA Walsh" <law@sgi.com>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
> > a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
> > what the name of this should/will be. Does it follow that convention
> > would point toward a linux/sys directory?
> >
>
> I suggested include/kernel and include/arch with include/linux and
> include/asm being reserved for the kernel interfaces (ioctl and their
> structures mostly.)

It would also be useful to put *32 structures for 32->64bit conversion
in there (to prepare for a generic 32->64bit conversion layer in 2.5)

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:25 EST