Re: silly [< >] and other excess

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 23 2000 - 02:55:57 EST


Ragnar Hojland Espinosa writes:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:26:30AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > Oh, missed this one. Here you're wrong again. The numbers in [< >]
> > should be looked up, and no others. The code can look exactly like
> > a kernel address. In this case you definitely do NOT want to have
> > them converted.
>
> Okay. How about just using some prefix to the hex number, such as '>'?
> It'll still save plenty of space, and would be trivial changes for the
> tools.

That is more a question for Keith Owens, not me. Keith is the maintainer
of ksymoops. He has to be happy with the address highlighting. I just
have to be happy that we don't loose ksymoops.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
  | +-+-+ --- -+-
  / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
 / | | | --- |
    +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST