Re: gcc 2.95.2 is buggy

From: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp
Date: Fri Nov 24 2000 - 03:27:41 EST

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: Raising MAX_UNITS in net drivers oopses kernel reproducibly"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: oddity introduced between 2.4.0-test10 & -test11"
In reply to: Peter Samuelson: "Re: gcc 2.95.2 is buggy"
Next in thread: Tom Rini: "Re: gcc 2.95.2 is buggy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Peter Samuelson writes:
> [Chris Wedgwood]
> > taking away -O2 is a 'fix' for now... not a very good one though.
>
> Not if you want function inlining to work. The kernel *won't compile*
> without optimization.

Using -O1 still works, at least for the demo program.

--
Computer Systems Laboratory, Fujitsu Labs.
kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: Raising MAX_UNITS in net drivers oopses kernel reproducibly"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: oddity introduced between 2.4.0-test10 & -test11"
In reply to: Peter Samuelson: "Re: gcc 2.95.2 is buggy"
Next in thread: Tom Rini: "Re: gcc 2.95.2 is buggy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:11 EST