Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Nov 25 2000 - 15:06:31 EST

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
In reply to: Andries Brouwer: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Next in thread: Olaf Dietsche: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Reply: Olaf Dietsche: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:26:15PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > The gcc-2.95.2-6cl from Conectiva 6.0 is buggy too.
>
> Yes. Probably you have seen it by now, but the difference between
> good and bad versions of gcc-2.95.2 did not lie in the applied patches,
> but was the difference between compilation for 686 or 386.
> It is not your (SuSE's, Debian's) fault. A fix already exists.

Indeed, this should be fixed soon.

I'm sure a simple 'apt-get upgrade' will install a new
gcc RPM on my workstation soon ;)

cheers,

Rik

-- Hollywood goes for world dumbination, Trailer at 11.

http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
In reply to: Andries Brouwer: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Next in thread: Olaf Dietsche: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Reply: Olaf Dietsche: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:14 EST