Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sat Nov 25 2000 - 20:19:40 EST


Andries Brouwer writes:
> Oh, please - something is wrong with your reading comprehension.
> Don't you understand the word "irrelevant"? It means that the
> initial value does not matter. It does not mean undefined.
> Please reread my letter and comment when you understand my point.

So now you try personnal insult to get your non-point across?

There is no more discussion to be had; this has rapidly decended into
yet another flaming match which I do not want to continue. Please
decist, and we'll all keep our opinions to ourselves on this matter, ok?
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
  | +-+-+ --- -+-
  / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
 / | | | --- |
    +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:15 EST