Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Tue Nov 28 2000 - 20:11:50 EST

Next message: Dan Hollis: "Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]"
Previous message: J . A . Magallon: "Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Nov 29 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Side note: that could generate mem/io corruption only on headactive devices
> (like IDE).

Yep, that's why I told Linus it was a long shot and couldn't possibly
account for all the corruption cases reported. And one would expect
fs corruption to go with that as well. So it's of course a long shot,
but still worth trying for Petr.

-- 
* Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
* SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dan Hollis: "Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]"
Previous message: J . A . Magallon: "Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:21 EST