Re: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3)

From: Igmar Palsenberg (maillist@chello.nl)
Date: Sat Dec 02 2000 - 16:35:34 EST


> "totally block"?
>
> For a blocking fd, read(2) has always blocked until some data is
> available. There has never been a guarantee, for any driver, that
> a read(2) will return the full amount of bytes requested.

Hmm.. Some came to mind :

Making /dev/random block if the amount requirements aren't met makes sense
to me. If I request x bytes of random stuff, and get less, I probably
reread /dev/random. If it's entropy pool is exhausted it makes sense to be
to block.

Just some mind spin.

> There is no need to document this... man read(2) ;-)
>
> Jeff

        Igmar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 21:00:09 EST