Re: swapoff weird

From: David Feuer (David_Feuer@brown.edu)
Date: Sun Dec 10 2000 - 04:10:15 EST


At 01:56 AM 12/10/2000 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:

>[David Feuer]
> > Perhaps it would be good to put a check in unlink to make sure that
> > this is not the last link to a swapfile.
>
>Much better to add code to /sbin/swapon and /sbin/swapoff to set and
>clear immutable bit. Sure it only works on ext2 but how far do you
>want to take this thing?

In a private email, linux@horizon.com wrote:

>No; we should add some more magic-symlink /proc entries, like
>/proc/<pid>/fd/<n> for swap files. Then they can be accessed
>by swapoff even if they're deleted.

Seems like a good idea to me...

--
This message has been brought to you by the letter alpha and the number pi.
Open Source: Think locally; act globally.
David Feuer
David_Feuer@brown.edu

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST