Yo All!
Scott McDermott <vaxerdec@frontiernet.net> convinced me the way
to fix my problem with SMBFS was to use the INIT_LIST_HEAD() macro.
This allows SMBFS to compile and may even be correct:
--- sock.c.dist Mon Dec 11 15:26:56 2000
+++ sock.c Mon Dec 11 15:27:03 2000
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
found_data(sk);
return;
}
- job->cb.next = NULL; // gem
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&job->cb.list);
job->cb.sync = 0;
job->cb.routine = smb_data_callback;
job->cb.data = job;
I am confused because INIT_LIST_HEAD() sets the next and prev
pointers to point to the current structure. I just have to
assume the list folks know what they are doing and that is why they
made it a macro.
Could someone that knows lists and/or smbfs look at this?
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST