Re: VM problem (2.4.0-test11)

From: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (ragnar@jazzfree.com)
Date: Wed Dec 13 2000 - 08:55:22 EST

Next message: josef höök: "Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit"
Previous message: Matthew Dharm: "Re: Is this a compromise and how?"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: VM problem (2.4.0-test11)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 12:41:19AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> There are various patches-ways-to-do available, kernel gurus are still working
> on it...
> (leave always some 4% of mem for root, kill some process when mem is exhausted,
> which one to kill...)

which is a bad idea; 4% of 1GB is a waste, and 4% of 8mb is really pushing
it (that is, if we are speaking about root just doing cleanup stuff)

-- ____/| Ragnar Højland Freedom - Linux - OpenGL Fingerprint 94C4B \ o.O| 2F0D27DE025BE2302C =(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for 104B78C56 B72F0822 U chaos and madness await thee at its end." hkp://keys.pgp.com

Handle via comment channels only. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: josef höök: "Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit"
Previous message: Matthew Dharm: "Re: Is this a compromise and how?"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: VM problem (2.4.0-test11)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:28 EST