Re: linux ipv6 questions. bugs?

From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Thu Dec 14 2000 - 14:31:58 EST


Hello!

> sendto(3, "\200\0\0\0l\32\0\0\7\2678:YH\16\0\10\t\n\v\f\r\16\17\20"..., 64, 0, {sin_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(58), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::1", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=htonl(0)}}, 24) = 64
> setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, {it_interval={0, 0}, it_value={1, 0}}, NULL) = 0
> time(NULL) = 976795399
> recvmsg(3, 0xbffff9e4, 0) = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted)--- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
>
> - /proc/net/snmp6 (zero entries removed) -
> Ip6InReceives 6
> Ip6OutRequests 6
> Icmp6InMsgs 6
> Icmp6InEchos 3
> Icmp6InEchoReplies 3
> Icmp6OutMsgs 15
> Icmp6OutEchoReplies 3
> Icmp6OutRouterSolicits 8
> Icmp6OutNeighborSolicits 4

It is very interesting, indeed. I was going to suspect DNS,
now it is clear that the problem is not here.

I still have no guesses, what happened with you.

> little about this, but should I be able to ping6 these link addresses?

Yes, of course.

> bash-2.04# ping6 fe80::a00:2bff:fe95:1d7b
> connect: Invalid argument

Yes, of course. Link local address without interface is invalid.

Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:30 EST