Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Actually, I suspect that quite a few of us had done that since long -
> IIRC I've got burned on 1.2/1.3 and decided that I had enough. Bugger if I
> remember what exactly it was - ISTR that it was restore(8) built with
> 1.3.<something> headers and playing funny games on 1.2, but it might be
> something else...
So then what's the correct header tree to put in /usr/include/linux? I
could use the stock 2.2.14-patched headers that came with the dist, but
how often does it need to be updated? Or should I use the latest 2.2?
-- "Windows for Dummies? Isn't that redundant?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:31 EST