Sticking my nose where it doesn't belong...
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Yes, but 2.96 is also binary incompatible with all non-redhat distro's.
> > And since redhat is _the_ distro that commercial entities use to
> > release software for, this was very arguably a bad move.
> o We tell vendors to build RPMv3 , glibc 2.1.x
Curious HOW do you tell vendors??
> o Vendors not being stupid understand that they have a bigger market
> share if they do that.
Ummm.. I remember Oracle's first release... wasn't it JUST redhat??
-- -------------------------------------------------------- Michael Peddemors - Senior Consultant Unix Administration - WebSite Hosting Network Services - Programming Wizard Internet Services http://www.wizard.ca Linux Support Specialist - http://www.linuxmagic.com -------------------------------------------------------- (604) 589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada -------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:31 EST