Re: Netfilter is broken (was Re: ip_defrag is broken (was: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback))

• Next message: Russell Cattelan: "Test12 ll_rw_block error."
• Previous message: vidar-kernel@gs.bergen.hl.no: "(no subject)"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Netfilter is broken (was Re: ip_defrag is broken (was: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback))"
• Next in thread: Mohammad A. Haque: "Re: ip_defrag is broken (was: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 01:48:32AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Also is it sure that the backtrace involves ip_rcv ? A more likely
> guess is that it happens during the IP_LOCAL_OUT hook, when skb->dev
> isn't set yet, but conntrack already has to already reassemble fragments.

Oh, thanks Andi. This is the key, of course. I'm always way too focused
on forwarded packets ;)

This is definitely the problem.

We could set skb->dev to skb->dst->dev, but this sounds more like a
hack than a real solution...

> -Andi

-- 
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org                http://www.gnumonks.org
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M- 
V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Russell Cattelan: "Test12 ll_rw_block error."
• Previous message: vidar-kernel@gs.bergen.hl.no: "(no subject)"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Netfilter is broken (was Re: ip_defrag is broken (was: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback))"
• Next in thread: Mohammad A. Haque: "Re: ip_defrag is broken (was: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:31 EST