Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug?

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 04:11:42 EST


Hi!

> > How about adding a flag to FLAGS, or a new letter in STATE in
> > /proc/pid/stat, to mean "this is an idle task"?
> >
> > ps & top could easily by taught to recognise the flag.
>
> What's the problem with using PID 0 as the idle task ? That's 'standard'
> with OS'ses that display the idle task.

Linux has already another thread with pid 0, called "swapper" which is
in fact idle. kidle-apmd is different beast.

> It's also the 'right' thing to do, and should directly work with top / ps

Yes, we should make pid 0 visible to userlnad, agreed.

                                                                Pavel

-- 
The best software in life is free (not shareware)!		Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST