On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 02:26:12 +0000 (GMT),
Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>I've not noticed this on earlier kernel versions, is there something
>silly I'm missing that's making my DEC hinote VP (p100 laptop)s
>system clock slow by a factor of five or so after resume?
>Not the CPU or cmos clock, only the system clock.
Try this.
Index: 0-test13-pre3.2/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
--- 0-test13-pre3.2/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:23:40 +1100 kaos (linux-2.4/z/c/34_apm.c 1.1.1.7.2.5 644)
+++ 0-test13-pre3.2(w)/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:04:28 +1100 kaos (linux-2.4/z/c/34_apm.c 1.1.1.7.2.5 644)
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ extern int (*console_blank_hook)(int);
* David Chen <chen@ctpa04.mit.edu>
*/
#undef INIT_TIMER_AFTER_SUSPEND
+#define INIT_TIMER_AFTER_SUSPEND
#ifdef INIT_TIMER_AFTER_SUSPEND
#include <linux/timex.h>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST