On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 09:33:58PM +0200, Petri Kaukasoina wrote:
> I think in case of BIOS-88 it now sees 1 Meg less than should. int 15, ah=88
Yes, you're right, sorry. Here a backout against 2.2.19pre3:
--- 2.2.19pre3-e820/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c.~1~ Fri Dec 22 14:51:26 2000
+++ 2.2.19pre3-e820/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Fri Dec 22 20:54:27 2000
@@ -376,8 +376,7 @@
e820.nr_map = 0;
add_memory_region(0, i386_endbase, E820_RAM);
- add_memory_region(HIGH_MEMORY, (mem_size << 10)-HIGH_MEMORY,
- E820_RAM);
+ add_memory_region(HIGH_MEMORY, (mem_size << 10), E820_RAM);
}
printk("BIOS-provided physical RAM map:\n");
print_memory_map(who);
The other part of the 2.4.x patch is still valid.
Thanks,
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:32 EST