Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

From: Blu3Viper (david@linux.com)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:28:08 EST

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [testcase] madvise->semaphore deadlock 2.4.0"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1"
In reply to: jamal: "Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)"
Next in thread: Blu3Viper: "Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Actually if you count arp which is also part of ip; ip becomes smaller
> by about 15K.

...i always forget some small detail.

thx

-d

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [testcase] madvise->semaphore deadlock 2.4.0"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1"
In reply to: jamal: "Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)"
Next in thread: Blu3Viper: "Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:21 EST