Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?

From: Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:05:11 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] dn_keyb.c: restore_flags on failure"
Previous message: Gerhard Mack: "Re: kernel network problem ?"
In reply to: Christoph Rohland: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Next in thread: Christoph Rohland: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Reply: Christoph Rohland: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 04:45:10PM +0100, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> AFAIU mlock'ed pages would never get deactivated since the ptes do not
> get dropped.

D'oh, right --- so can't you lock a segment just by bumping page_count
on its pages?

--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] dn_keyb.c: restore_flags on failure"
Previous message: Gerhard Mack: "Re: kernel network problem ?"
In reply to: Christoph Rohland: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Next in thread: Christoph Rohland: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Reply: Christoph Rohland: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:21 EST