Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch,

From: Cacophonix (cacophonix@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 23:18:15 EST


I haven't tracked the IP storage group too closely, but was at the San Diego IETF
where there were some interesting debates about this issue.

There is a write-up at http://ips.pdl.cs.cmu.edu/mail/msg02598.html

Now I'm not sure if I agree with some of the assumptions. And I share your concern
about using multiple tcp streams.

Thoughts?

cheers,
karthik

--- Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ips-fcovertcpip-01.txt>
> > show that both use TCP/IP. TCP/IP has variable length headers (or am i on
> > crack?), which totally complicates the receive path.
>
> TCP has variable length headers. It also prevents you re-ordering commands
> in the stream which would be beneficial. I've not checked if the draft uses
> multiple TCP streams but then you have scaling questions.
>
> Alan
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:25 EST