>>>>> " " == Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> Hubert Mantel writes:
>> is this part of 2.2.19pre7 really a good idea? Even in 2.4.0
>> the size field is still a short.
>> #define NFS_MAXFHSIZE 64
>> struct nfs_fh {
>> - unsigned short size;
>> + unsigned int size;
>> unsigned char data[NFS_MAXFHSIZE]; };
> This is an internal kernel data structure. Do you know of some
> program that breaks as a result of this?
> _____
Any program which mounts an NFS partition.
If you do this, then you need to provide some sort of compatibility
layer for nfs_mount.h since the format for version 4 of the NFS mount
structure was decided more than 2 years ago.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:30 EST