Re: khttpd beats boa with persistent patch

From: Christoph Lameter (christoph@lameter.com)
Date: Sat Jan 13 2001 - 08:46:29 EST


On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, dean gaudet wrote:

> anyhow a real network benchmark might show that kHTTPd latency is actually
> not as broken as this one indicates. i'd however really hesitate to call
> this a win.

Well as Arjan says: khttpd starves userspace and that might cause the
latency. I dont have the ability to really test it over a 100mbs link.

> btw is your CPU slow or something? 'cause istr getting numbers at least
> this good from apache across localhost several years ago even under
> 2.0.x... and boa and khttpd should both beat apache in this.

Its a Cyrix 150. So yes.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:36 EST