On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:10:03PM +0200, Petru Paler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:32:40AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Petru Paler writes:
> > > > Oh, I think I know why this happens. Can you add this patch, and next
> > > > time the UDP bad csum message appears, tell me if it says "UDP packet
> > > > with bad csum was fragmented." in the next line of your syslog
> > > > messages? Thanks.
>
> Jan 14 06:54:08 grey kernel: Undo loss 193.230.129.57/34342 c2 l0 ss2/2 p0
> Jan 14 06:56:40 grey kernel: udp v4 hw csum failure.
> Jan 14 06:57:05 grey kernel: Undo partial loss 193.230.129.57/34342 c1 l5 ss2/3 p5
>
> So no "UDP packet with bad csum was fragmented" line. This is the first
> one though, will let you know if the fragmented thing occurs.
Got more "udp v4 hw csum failure" messages but still no "UDP packet with bad csum was fragmented".
-- Petru Paler, mailto:ppetru@ppetru.net http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:39 EST