>>>>> " " == Mogens Kjaer <mk@crc.dk> writes:
> This turned out to be more difficult than I thought...
> I suspect glibc-2.2-12 being the reason, but I'm not quite sure
> yet:
> The problem is, that the 64-bit dirent's are converted to
> 32-bit dirent's and a sanity check is performed, if the inodes
> or offsets don't fit into 32 bits.
> The offset of the last entry is 4294967295 (no, not -1), this
> won't fit in a signed 32 bit number.
> Does this number come from the SGI or from the NFS stuff in the
> Linux kernel?
It comes from the SGI. The NFS client just considers it all a cookie,
and passes it on to glibc. We probably shouldn't do that, as indeed
the cookie is not guaranteed to be 32-bit signed, but it's what we
always did for 2.2.x.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST