On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > {
> > int val = 1;
> > setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK,
> > (char *)&val,sizeof(val));
> > val = 0;
> > setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK,
> > (char *)&val,sizeof(val));
> > }
> >
> > differ from what you posted. It does the same in my opinion. Maybe we are
> > not talking about the same thing?
>
> The above is equivalent to SIOCPUSH _only_ if the caller wasn't using either
> TCP_NODELAY or TCP_CORK.
why? I can restore whatever state i want, the above is just a mechanizm to
force the push.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST