Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers

From: Werner Almesberger (Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:08:07 EST

Next message: Val Henson: "Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?"
Previous message: Otto Meier: "Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Keith Owens wrote:
> It is part of my total Makefile rewrite for 2.5.

Oh, I see. Too bad.

> A clean implementation of module parameters mapping to setup code requires
> the mapping of a source file to the module it is linked into.

I was afraid that this would be a problem (and hoping that you've found
some miracle solution ;-)

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH           Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch /
/_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Val Henson: "Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?"
Previous message: Otto Meier: "Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST