Re: oops, signal 11

From: Ralf Baechle (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:31:10 EST


On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:46:50PM +0100, mkloppstech@freenet.de wrote:

> I know that signal 11 with gcc is a sign of bad hardware; however it
> strikes me that I don't get random oopses - a whole bunch of them is appended.

The compiler tends to hammer harder on the memory than the kernel; this
is a sign of the great effort which was taken to optimize the kernel's
cache usage.

  Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:26 EST