Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN

From: Lars Marowsky-Bree (lmb@suse.de)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:44:26 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN"
In reply to: James Sutherland: "Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN"
Next in thread: James Sutherland: "Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN"
Reply: James Sutherland: "Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2001-01-26T11:40:36,
James Sutherland <jas88@cam.ac.uk> said:

> A delayed retry without ECN might be a good compromise...

_NO!!!!!_

Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN"
In reply to: James Sutherland: "Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN"
Next in thread: James Sutherland: "Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN"
Reply: James Sutherland: "Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:24 EST